一种使用交互分析武器系统对作战场景基于过程建模的方法

Dongsu JEONG; Dohyun KIM; Yoonho SEO

doi:10.1631/FITEE.1900649

Your Location：

Home >

Browse articles >

一种使用交互分析武器系统对作战场景基于过程建模的方法

常规文章 | Updated：2022-05-19

- 一种使用交互分析武器系统对作战场景基于过程建模的方法
  Enhanced Publication
- Method for process-based modeling of combat scenarios using interaction analysis weapon systems
- 信息与电子工程前沿（英文） 2021年22卷第3期页码：415-436
- Affiliations：
  
  Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Korea University, Seoul KS013, Korea
- Author bio：
  
  [ "Dongsu JEONG, E-mail: jdsvs2979@korea.ac.kr" ]
  [ "Dohyun KIM, E-mail: davydo@korea.ac.kr" ]
  Yoonho SEO, E-mail: yoonhoseo@korea.ac.kr
- Funds：
  
  Project supported by the Defense Acquisition Program Administration and Agency for Defense Development of the Republic of Korea (Nos. UD110006MD and UD140022PD)
- DOI：10.1631/FITEE.1900649
  中图分类号： TP391.9
- 纸质出版日期：2021-03，
  
  收稿日期：2019-11-26，
  
  修回日期：2021-02-11，
- Accepted：
Scan QR Code
Dongsu JEONG, Dohyun KIM, Yoonho SEO. 一种使用交互分析武器系统对作战场景基于过程建模的方法[J]. 信息与电子工程前沿（英文）, 2021,22(3):415-436.

DONGSU JEONG, DOHYUN KIM, YOONHO SEO. Method for process-based modeling of combat scenarios using interaction analysis weapon systems. [J]. Frontiers of information technology & electronic engineering, 2021, 22(3): 415-436.
Dongsu JEONG, Dohyun KIM, Yoonho SEO. 一种使用交互分析武器系统对作战场景基于过程建模的方法[J]. 信息与电子工程前沿（英文）, 2021,22(3):415-436. DOI： 10.1631/FITEE.1900649.

DONGSU JEONG, DOHYUN KIM, YOONHO SEO. Method for process-based modeling of combat scenarios using interaction analysis weapon systems. [J]. Frontiers of information technology & electronic engineering, 2021, 22(3): 415-436. DOI： 10.1631/FITEE.1900649.

摘要

随着技术进步，武器系统开发变得复杂而昂贵。在概念设计阶段使用建模和仿真（M&S）技术可有效减少武器的开发时间和成本。为降低与武器开发相关的复杂性，减少反复试验，一种方法是使用M&S技术开发作战方案，以审查分配给新武器的功能。尽管M&S技术适用于该方法，由于战斗场景建模固有的动态特性（考虑到不同武器实体之间的相互关系），难以分析武器的运行效率。为审查具备这些特征的武器功能，本文开发了一种基于过程的建模（PBM）方法来对战斗场景中武器之间的相互作用建模。该方法包括以下3个步骤：（1）通过将武器和武器功能转换为相应的组件来构建虚拟模型；（2）依据战斗情景生成战斗过程，该战斗过程是使用推理规则从被研究的武器之间的相互关系中得出的；（3）通过将战斗过程与虚拟模型相结合，开发一种基于过程的模型来描述武器功能。然后，实现了基于该方法的PBM系统。在该系统上开展案例研究，结果表明，在从各种作战场景中得出基于过程的模型、使用该模型分析武器功能以及在概念设计阶段减少武器开发问题方面，该系统均体现作用。

Abstract

With technological advancements

weapon system development has become increasingly complex and costly. Using modeling and simulation (M&S) technology in the conceptual design stage is effective in reducing the development time and cost of weapons. One way to reduce the complexity and trial-and-error associated with weapon development using M&S technology is to develop combat scenarios to review the functions assigned to new weapons. Although the M&S technology is applicable

it is difficult to analyze how effectively the weapons are functioning

because of the dynamic features inherent in combat scenario modeling

which considers interrelations among different weapon entities. To support review of weapon functions including these characteristics

this study develops a process-based modeling (PBM) method to model the interactions between weapons in the combat scenario. This method includes the following three steps: (1) construct virtual models by converting the weapons and the weapon functions into their corresponding components; (2) generate the combat process from the combat scenario

which is derived from the interrelations among weapons under consideration using reasoning rules; (3) develop a process-based model that describes weapon functions by combining the combat process with virtual models. Then

a PBM system based on this method is implemented. The case study executed on this system shows that it is useful in deriving process-based models from various combat scenarios

analyzing weapon functions using the derived models

and reducing weapon development issues in the conceptual design stage.

关键词

武器系统基于过程的建模 (PBM)作战场景交互分析元模型Petri网

Keywords

Weapon systemsProcess-based modeling (PBM)Combat scenarioInteraction analysisMetamodelPetri net

references

M Alshayeb, , , N Khashan, , , S Mahmood. . A framework for an integrated unified modeling language. . Front Inform Technol Electron Eng, , 2016. . 17((2):):143--159. . DOI:10.1631/FITEE.1500094http://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1500094..

BK Choi, , , D Kang. . Modeling and Simulation of Discrete-Event Systems, , ::Hoboken, USAJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc, , 2013. ..

J Choi, , , S Moon, , , T Kim, , , 等. . Study of development for distributed battlefield simulation environment: one-to-one single unit engagement model. . J Korea Soc Simul, , 2015. . 24((4):):69--76. . DOI:10.9709/jkss.2015.24.4.069http://doi.org/10.9709/jkss.2015.24.4.069..

JD Claxton, , , C Cavoli, , , C Johnson. . Test and Evaluation Management Guide, , 5th Ed.::Fort Belvoir, USADefense Acquisition University Press, , 2005. ..

Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA). . Guide Book of Weapon System Test and Evaluation. . Defense Acquisition Program Administration, Seoul, Korea, , 2012. ..

H Eisner, , , J Marciniak, , , R McMillan. . Computer-aided system of systems (S2) engineering. . Proc IEEE Int Conf on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, , 1991. . p.531--537. . DOI:10.1109/icsmc.1991.169739http://doi.org/10.1109/icsmc.1991.169739..

S Jafer, , , U Durak. . Tackling the complexity of simulation scenario development in aviation. . Proc Symp on Modeling and Simulation of Complexity in Intelligent, Adaptive and Autonomous Systems, , 2017. . p. 1--10. . DOI:10.22360/springsim.2017.msciaas.005http://doi.org/10.22360/springsim.2017.msciaas.005..

D Jeong, , , D Kim, , , Y Seo. . Research of ontology based battlefield scenario generation systems. . Proc 2nd Int Conf on Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Engineering, , 2016. . p. 393--396. . DOI:10.2991/aiie-16.2016.90http://doi.org/10.2991/aiie-16.2016.90..

DS Jeong, , , YH Seo. . Process-based ship production system modeling for supporting decision processes. . Proc 32nd Annual European Simulation and Modelling Conf, , 2018. . p. 82--87. . ..

DY Jeong, , , GI Kim, , , SS Cho, , , 等. . The Latest Weapon Systematology, , ::Seoul, KoreaCHEONG MOON GAK Publishing Company, , 2014. ..

R Kewley, , , J Cook, , , N Goerger, , , 等. . Federated simulations for systems of systems integration. . Winter Simulation Conf, , 2008. . p.1121--1129. . DOI:10.1109/wsc.2008.4736181http://doi.org/10.1109/wsc.2008.4736181..

CO Kim, , , YH Cho, , , JU Yoon, , , 等. . Ontology based negotiation case search system for the resolution of exceptions in collaborative production planning. In: Meersman R, Tari Z, Herrero P (Eds. ), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2005: OTM 2005 Workshops, , ::Berlin HeidelbergSpringer, , 2005. . p. 24--25. . DOI:10.1007/11575863_12http://doi.org/10.1007/11575863_12..

D Kim, , , Y Seo, , , DM Sheen. . Dynamic component reconfiguration system using case-based reasoning for weapons system in DM&S: guided weapon case. . Proc IEEE European Modelling Symp, , 2015. . p. 9--13. . DOI:10.1109/ems.2015.12http://doi.org/10.1109/ems.2015.12..

TG Kim, , , IC Moon. . Combat modeling using the DEVS formalism. In: Tolk A (Ed. ), Engineering Principles of Combat Modeling and Distributed Simulation, , ::Hoboken, USAWiley, , 2012. . p. 479--510. . DOI:10.1002/9781118180310.ch21http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118180310.ch21..

TG Kim, , , SJ Kwon, , , B Kang. . Modeling and simulation methodology for defense systems based on concept of system of systems. . J Korean Inst Ind Eng, , 2013. . 39((6):):450--460. . DOI:10.7232/JKⅡE.2013.39.6.450http://doi.org/10.7232/JKⅡE.2013.39.6.450..

B Lee, , , Y Seo. . A design of operational test & evaluation system for weapon systems thru process-based modeling. . J Korea Soc Simul, , 2014. . 23((4):):211--218. . DOI:10.9709/jkss.2014.23.4.211http://doi.org/10.9709/jkss.2014.23.4.211..

JO Lee, , , JJ Lee, , , JB Suk, , , 等. . A development of the dynamic reconfigurable components based on software product line: guided weapon system. . J Korea Soc Simul, , 2010. . 19((4):):179--188. . ..

PJ Lee, , , YU Lee. . A study on weapon systems acquisition for the use of Modeling & Simulation (M&S). . Conv Secur J, , 2011. . 11((3):):11--17. . ..

XB Li, , , YL Lei, , , H Vangheluwe, , , 等. . A multi-paradigm decision modeling framework for combat system effectiveness measurement based on domain-specific modeling. . J Zhejiang Univ-Sci C (Comput & Electron), , 2013. . 14((5):):311--331. . DOI:10.1631/jzus.C1200374http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.C1200374..

XB Li, , , F Yang, , , YL Lei, , , 等. . A model framework-based domain-specific composable modeling method for combat system effectiveness simulation. . Soft Syst Model, , 2017. . 16((4):):1201--1222. . DOI:10.1007/s10270-015-0513-xhttp://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-015-0513-x..

YL Luo, , , YN Wu, , , YH Qin, , , 等. . Modeling method for integration of air command and security process. . Int J Model Simul Sci Comput, , 2016. . 7((1):):1641004DOI:10.1142/s179396231641004xhttp://doi.org/10.1142/s179396231641004x..

H No, , , T Son. . NCW: trends of developed countries and challenges of ROK. . J Korean Def Iss Anal, , 2005. . 10465--19. . ..

Object Management Group (OMG). . OMG Unified Modeling Language Specification, , 15th Ed.::Framingham, MA, USAObject Management Group, Inc, , 2003. ..

SR Oh, , , DS Jeong, , , YH Seo. . Scenario-based evaluation object selection research for performance evaluation of weapon systems. . Proc Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society Joint Conf, , 2016. . p.1239--1244. . ..

G Özhan, , , H Oğuztüzün, , , P Evrensel. . Modeling of field artillery tasks with live sequence charts. . J Def Mod Simul Appl Meth Techn, , 2008. . 5((4):):219--252. . DOI:10.1177/875647930800500402http://doi.org/10.1177/875647930800500402..

HR Park, , , YH Seo. . AHP-based ontology integration method for weapon function. . J Inform Techn Arch, , 2015. . 12((1):):99--112. . ..

SC Park, , , Y Kwon, , , K Seong, , , 等. . Simulation framework for small scale engagement. . Comput Ind Eng, , 2010. . 59((3):):463--472. . DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2010.06.003http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2010.06.003..

SK Park, , , JY Lee. . A study on the assessment of power improvement effectiveness of corps level C4I system applied to integrated fire operation. . J Mil Oper Res Soc Korea, , 2003. . 29((1):):26..

ZH Qi, , , ZY Wang, , , WH Zhang, , , 等. . Design and implication of attack and defense simulation system for ballistic missile with UML. . J Syst Simul, , 2006. . 18((3):):602--603, 606. . DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-731X.2006.03.020http://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-731X.2006.03.020..

LB Rainey, , , A Tolk. . Modeling and Simulation Support for System of Systems Engineering Applications, , ::Hoboken, USAWiley, , 2015. . DOI:10.1002/9781118501757http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118501757..

K Schwenn, , , J Colombi, , , T Wu, , , 等. . Toward agent-based modeling of the U. S. Department of Defense Acquisition System. . Proc Comput Sci, , 2015. . 44383--392. . DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.038http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.038..

DJ Seo, , , Y Seo. . A method for build an ontology-based component semantic search system for reconfiguration of weapon system. . J Korea Soc Simul, , 2016. . 25((1):):11--20. . DOI:10.9709/jkss.2016.25.1.011http://doi.org/10.9709/jkss.2016.25.1.011..

KM Seo, , , C Choi, , , TG Kim, , , 等. . DEVS-based combat modeling for engagement-level simulation. . Simulation, , 2014. . 90((7):):759--781. . DOI:10.1177/0037549714532960http://doi.org/10.1177/0037549714532960..

KM Seo, , , W Hong, , , TG Kim. . Enhancing model composability and reusability for entity-level combat simulation: a conceptual modeling approach. . Simulation, , 2017. . 93((10):):825--840. . DOI:10.1177/0037549717699872http://doi.org/10.1177/0037549717699872..

Y Seo, , , T Kim, , , B Kim, , , 等. . Representation and performance analysis of manufacturing cell based on generalized stochastic petri net. . Int J Ind Eng Theor Appl Pract, , 2006. . 13((1):):99--107. . ..

Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO). . Standard for Military Scenario Definition Language (MSDL), SISO-STD-007-2008. . Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, Orlando, USA, , 2008. ..

MJ Son, , , DY Cho, , , T Kim, , , 等. . Modeling and simulation of target motion analysis for a submarine using a script-based tactics manager. . Adv Eng Softw, , 2010. . 41((3):):506--516. . DOI:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.10.009http://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.10.009..

A Tolk. . Engineering Principles of Combat Modeling and Distributed Simulation, , ::Hoboken, USAWiley, , 2012. . DOI:10.1002/9781118180310http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118180310..

A Tolk, , , SY Diallo, , , JJ Padilla, , , 等. . Reference modelling in support of M&Sjfoundations and applications. . J Simul, , 2013. . 7((2):):69--82. . DOI:10.1057/jos.2013.3http://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2013.3..

United States Department of the Army (USDA). . Reconnaissance Helicopter Operations, FM 3-04.126. Headquarters, Department of the Army. . Washington, USA, , 2007. ..

U.S. Department of Defense (USDoD). . Revision C, Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items, New MIL-STD-881. . Department of Defense Standard Practice, Washington, U, , 2011. ..

WG Wang, , , A Tolk, , , WP Wang. . The levels of conceptual interoperability model: applying systems engineering principles to M&S, , 2009. . https://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0191https://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0191, , ..

RLJr Wittman, , , CT Harrison. . OneSAF: a Product Line Approach to Simulation Development. . MITRE Corporation, Orlando, FL, USA, , 2001. ..

XY Zhao, , , X Zhou, , , Y Mei, , , 等. . Structure and content enhancement to military scenario definition language. . Int IEEE Symp on Robotics and Applications, , 2012. . p.379--382. . ..

浏览量

Downloads

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

工具集

关联资源

Preserving privacy information flow security in composite service evolution

Using information flow analysis to detect implicit information leaks for web service composition